Paytm CEO Vijay Shekhar Sharma recently took to social media platform X to share an intriguing interaction he had with Elon Musk-launched GenAI platform Grok. Sharma revealed that he had asked the AI chatbot what it knew about the city of Ayodhya and the events happening there. The response from Grok left the internet in awe as it provided a detailed and insightful description of Ayodhya’s sacred significance and the upcoming consecration ceremony.
In his question to Grok, Sharma inquired about what the platform knew about Ayodhya and the events that were set to take place in the city. In response, Grok provided a comprehensive description of Ayodhya, highlighting its importance as one of the seven sacred cities in Hinduism and its significance as the birthplace of Lord Rama. The AI chatbot also delved into detail about the long-awaited consecration ceremony, describing it as a grand affair that holds immense importance for millions of Hindus worldwide.
Users on the platform praised Grok for its in-depth knowledge and insightful response. Some even referred to the AI chatbot as a fast learner. However, in contrast, a user shared the version of Microsoft Copilot, another AI chatbot, which provided a different perspective on the events in Ayodhya. While both AI platforms shared similar information about the consecration ceremony, Microsoft Copilot added details about the historical and political conflicts surrounding the city, including the demolition of a mosque and the resulting legal and political battles.
The interaction between Sharma and the AI platforms sparked a discussion about the capabilities and interpretations of AI technology. While some users appreciated the detailed insights provided by the chatbots, others raised concerns about the differing perspectives and interpretations offered by different AI platforms. The conversation highlighted the evolving nature of AI technology and its potential impact on information dissemination and understanding. Opinions about the AI chatbots’ responses varied, with some expressing admiration for their knowledge, while others questioned the accuracy and implications of their interpretations.